As I read through Kohn’s article I found myself re-reading a
lot of it. I felt that there was no organization and that his piece did not
flow. He brought up many strong points about both sides of the argument. I wasn’t
sure which side he was taking. He kept mentioning that grade inflation is real
but then he would go back on his word and say that it was not real. I guess he
was trying to tell his readers that there were two strong opinions that made
sense on grade inflation. I think he ended his article on how he believes we shouldn’t
have grades in our society today. Overall I think he mentioned both sides to
make his original argument stronger.
No comments:
Post a Comment